Usg vs pfsense reddit. The “lan” only has 2 hosts, Edgerouter and pfsense.
Usg vs pfsense reddit I ended up biting on a ZyXEL "ZyWALL USG 100" which seemed very apt for the job and reasonably priced as well at $350. New comments cannot be posted. I have fios (~ 1 gigabit) for an ISP and i'm replacing a WRT1900ACS. The used server I got was Looking to buy a new Router (without AP capability) I am facing the decision of buying a Mini-PC with 2-4 ports and installing PFSense on it vs buying Cloud Gateway Ultra from Ubiquity. If you really want an all in one dashboard get the USG, but pfsense gives you at least the same functionality and probably more with add on packages etc. Trying to keep the USG and pfSense both Actually I think the usg is harder, precisely because half the pointy clicks stuff doesn't work or isn't there. I figure that the chirping was coming from a capacitor on the USG board being charged and discharged rapidly due to the PSU not supplying constant current. I can absolutely confirm this! I was running a pfSense already when I switched to a full UniFi setup including an USG and I started running both in parallel during the transition phase. (pfsense) vs learning to program by using a visual drag and drop interface that writes the code behind the scenes (firewalla). The house has a symmetrical gigabit fiber connection (1gbps up, 1gbps down). Not sure which router to get. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The USG has all of its firewall, load balancing, and NAT (you'll need JSON for this and LB) disabled. In the dynamic landscape of network security, your choice of a firewall solution is pivotal. I'm not sure how easy VLAN configuration would be with separate controllers for the ER and UAP, although having to manage them on two devices isn't that complex. This is all I need pfsense to do. Hi all, I have two Ubiquiti Unifi AC and one Unifi 24 Switch 250V. Pfsense has more features in its default config, and lots more in its extension repo. pfSense®, Untangle and Ubiquiti firewalls are among the most popular firewall used by SMEs and Enterprises. If you want something advanced, go with a PfSense system. ADMIN MOD What's everyone running for hardware for PFSense? I'm currently running a USG-3P Unifi, and I only have problems with it My current setup is as follows: Modem -> pfSense -> USG -> L3 switch There's a /30 between pfSense and the USG, and another /30 between the USG and L3 switch. I like the USG in general, but this is a no go for me unless you have the -XG. I moved to pfsense for (1) adblock and IP block, (2) more power and (3) QoS at higher speeds. You will not have a unified view of network traffic. The USG-Pro was aging and couldnt handle IDS/IPS at full gig speeds, which the UDM-Pro can. Functionally they're pretty equal. The “lan” only has 2 hosts, Edgerouter and pfsense. I want to be able to go into the unifi app to control routing and not mess with the pfsense box. Easy: you define your VLANs in both pfSense and Unifi. What was your reason for planning to go to a UDM-SE? Just newer or was there some feature you wanted? If you're just looking for something more modern and don't need Protect, the Cloud Gateway Ultra would be a great upgrade for you. Crosstalk heavily use the UniFi switches & WAP’s and use the AirMax products. Reddit's one-stop shop for everything relating to access control systems and security systems in general. Run pfsense behind the USG and best of both worlds? Is anyone out there also on the fence with I was on the fence between the USG and a Pfsense box. pfsense vs USG (USG Pro) This may get flagged as this has been talked about over and over again, but I wanted to throw it out there as it relates to my situation. Udm or usg + AP. It's, of course, a lot cheaper and the same form factor as your USG (vs. This is mostly a vent - my most likely route is UCG-Ultra to replace the USG-3P and my controller, and no other changes. But I notice through the USG I only get about 600MBPS sometimes I do get full Gigabit or around 940 but most of the time I am at around 600. Building a pfSense box instead. No cons. pfSense can be complex, but doesn't have to be. I have something like 12, or 13 vlans and never had a problem from the firewall to the switches. I'm building a new home network and I'm interested in a pfSense build but curious what suggested builds are right now. As for USG-PRO-4 vs ER-4, the ER-4 Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. I replaced my ER-4 with PFSense, but because it was unstable at my internet speeds (suricata causing watchdog to freak out) I switched to a UDM. The UDM-P would be fine and do the job as well but you'd have to replace the controller with the UDM-P's built in controller, whether or not that's a good idea is debatable and highly dependent on the business. I'm trying to figure this out but am not having any luck, and the pfsense sub doesn't seem to be helpful. purchase a mini-PC and use pfSense instead. USG, as with most Ubiquiti gear, features some very nice management tools, but lacks a legit enterprise feature set. I run pfSense on a Dell Wyze 5070 Extended - Pentium Silver 1. USG: 85 Mbps* USG-Pro: 250 Mbps* USG-XG: 1 Gbps* Enabling Smart Queues or DPI on top of IPS/IDS will also incur a further penalty to maximum throughput. I think documentation is better with pfSense and the online community better with OPNSense. io/ It’s much simpler and very similar to configuring a Cisco device. I have been using pfsense as the firewall router. I have been using pfSense since early 2016. pfSense is more capable than the v1 USG and it is very highly configurable, where the USG isn't as configurable and sometimes I've been using a pfSense box at home for a few years, recently moved the wifi and switching gear to UniFi and I've been wondering about doing using a USG "inside" the What is everyone using for pfsense/opnsense hardware now-a-days? 6 points • 18 comments • submitted 5 months ago by Verme to r/HomeNetworking Hi folks, I'm trying to find USG (UniFi integration) vs EdgeRouter X (better hardware) - which one would recommend for the full UniFi setup? Is the USG Pro 4 performance comparable with let’s say a pfsense router solution. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. pfSense actually has useful diagnostic and troubleshooting information, which is almost nonexistent in the Unifi controller. Ive considered switching that around just using the USGs second wan port for a whole network dedicated failover, but I like having pFsense as the front facing network Security Gateway (USG) = Old and slow Three gigabit RJ45, so you can have a 2nd LAN or a 2nd WAN. You seem to want a firewall as well as a gateway (router). VLAN configuration in pfSense is very straight forward, more obvious than UniFi IMO. Another USG-PRO-4 vs UDM-PRO decision vs PfSense vs ?! I have slowly replaced our factories Wifi AP + network switches with Unifi + UCK Gen2+ everythings working great. The UDM and USG-Pro are night and day different. Ahoi, I was trying to get familiar with pfSense but it was to mich to configure for my purposes of temporary replacing an USG until I get a replacement. 100/10 connection now ( Planning to upgrade to 250/10 Firewalla Gold is good if you want simple, although I don’t have a Ubiquiti router to compare against. I even did several videos If it's just as a downstream router between pfSense and the access point(s) then there should not be any config required as long as pfSense is the default route for the USG. pfSense opens you up to a world of firewall capabilities that are either not available on the USG, or are at least a pain. Of course that didn't give me enough to tinker with, so I decided to experiment with my own hardware and pfSense instead of the USG. Can't even do all the USG can and that's already not very much if you compare it to RouterOS, pfsense or opnsense for example. Unifi USG isn't very sophisticated; nice and viable up to ca 100Mbit Connection. Missing most new security, routing, and VPN features Very slow for VPN or IPS/IDS Security Gateway Pro (USG-Pro) = Rackmount USG Two gigabit SFP/RJ45, two gigabit RJ45. Setup took minutes (replaced a Unifi USG). The UDM is kinda bad and expensive for what little it can do. Look at the CPUs in consumer home routers which can easily manage gig throughput- these things are stripped down, low power things that are less powerful that a single core of a smartphone. The documentation is definitely not nearly as good for OPNSense as for pfSense. I think that running pfSense on a gateway is a much better solution than Unifi gateways. The UDM is crap, I deployed one once and will never do that again. IPsec appears to be the best option, but I have not been able to get it to work. I've heard so many good things about pfsense and I think I'd like it better. you can manually make changes to the USG via the CLI however the Unifi software doesn't "pull" configs from the USG which means it will attempt to re-provision the USG to the sets that it is aware of. I wasn't so lucky with finding answers for OPNSense. Yes, pfSense performs well If you throw a core i7 at it, but the UDMP is certainly no slouch, and will route 3. I have 1GB up/down fiber to the home. I'm happy with the setup and I really like the dashboard and map features of Unifi. Now what equipment is your PFsense box on? Hardware will matter if you want to do DPI etc. I am in need of some advice, opinions, and thoughts. pfSense has some of the best documentation around. Or check it out in the app stores Usg vs er-10x . Need a router, prebuilt with low power draw, has SFP. CPU is almost totally unimportant. The USG/UDM models are better firewalls, and less routers. In Unifi you can define networks as "VLAN only". Hence pfSense was way to much of a configuration and a bit to complex I found https://vyos. As a hyper-V vm the Ressource Posted by u/DarkhogToo - 58 votes and 62 comments Normally i would agree with buying old tech but you can get a USG for 50€ now used, thats fine till the successor arrives. LTT Screwdriver bit prices will go up soon, as Terren the new CEO deemed the current prices unprofitable (1:10:54 in case the timestamp somehow not working Ubiquiti UniFi Firewall vs pfSense: Making the Right Network Security Choice. As a router with basic firewall the ER-4 is great. Come and join us today! Members Online. I’m in the same boat, I really want some DPI/IDS stuff, been considering setting up a pfsense box. Yet most build pics i see typically have a UDM-Pro. Ubiquiti also have UISP Routers and EdgeRouters, which may be a better option for more advanced networks. UDM Pro vs USG & pfsense . The price and claimed performance of the UCG ultra pushed me over Unfortunately the USG 4 Pro doesn't have enough processing power to do IDS/IPS inspection for a 1 GB incoming WAN connection. It's simple to use when configured as a simple firewall. I also wouldn’t use a usg for business needs, go with pfsense or a UniFi edgerouter. USG vs USG-PRO vs UDM-Pro vs pfSense/OPNSense vs ISP provided Linksys Velop This is the Reddit community for EV owners and enthusiasts. Thank you for this post. Usg vs. Im considering one myself, but every thread i see about a UDM-Pro/SE strongly advises against it and recommends something like a protectli w/ pfsense. Unifi & PfSense or all Unifi . Uses like 6-7 watts. Help I am looking at using a Unifi USG or a whitebox PFSense machine. UniFi is separate from UISP, and My USG is walking on its last legs and I was weighting whether to replace it either with a pfsense/opnsense box for significantly more money or a mikrotik for significantly less. The only thing will be on pfSense adding the USG as a gateway and static routes to the subnet(s) behind it via that gateway. Both have good online support via forums (Untangle) and Reddit (Firewalla). Not entirely sure why you needed it though. I chose OPNSense over pfSense largely because of the behavior from NextGate and it's founder in reaction to the OPNSense fork of pfSense. But with their video products going over to protect, I'm not sure how much longer they are going to support cameras, as most of their new cams are protect only. hodge-podge of a Unifi AP (controller software on a Proxmox container on my main server), a Mikrotik switch, and pfSense Hello, I am currently using USG and new two Ubiquiti APS. Ultimately I decided on the USG since my entire network and security were all Ubiquiti gear. Updates are regular with OPNSense and not with pfSense. Another reason I got it was because of OpenVPN support. I have a few Looking for feedback and expertise on whether an "old" USG-PRO-4 ($25) is really that bad over buying a prefabbed or easily built $200 box for OPNsense or PFsense. If the only issue is power, why not run pfSense on a power sipping CPU. I'm borderline OCD and wanted uniformity. psSense is really a firewall with routing capabilities. Firewall is done by just adding an allow all rule at the top in the web GUI. 5Gbps fiber. 00. update: I gave up. One thing to be aware of with the USG, not all the features/ functions are exposed. All intra VLAN routing is done by the Edgerouter, including isolation, and pfsense only handles the internet side of things. On pi-hole DoH (cloudflared) would stop working (and do DNS without encryption) every other day or so requiring me to restart the service. PecksAndQuads. You should be comparing the UDM vs pfsense at this point The USG is pure junk (had one and got rid of it 2 weeks later I noped out of that and went pfsense, with unifi video and unifi controller running over ESXi on a small 6 port nuc I found online. There are options other than pfSense- OPNSense for one, but there's also stuff like Untangle and Sophos UTM and XG firewalls. The more advanced capabilities of pfSense far outweigh that loss tho, imo. I also want something to support 10GB speeds at the I'm considering replacing my CE installation with UniFi Gateway Ultra. Ubiquiti UniFi Firewall and pfSense represent two prominent options in this domain. . I need some help selecting the correct hardware though. PFSENSE running tailscale as a whole home zero-config VPN for remote access purposes. Then you just make a trunk connection between your pfSense and Unifi switch, and in pfSense define all your VLANs on the trunk port interface. Communication between hosts on the same VLAN doesn't touch pfsense and, thus, can proceed at wire rate on the switch. True, you don't need both USG and pfSense. " While you can technically purchase pfSense or Unifi networking gear, another thing to keep in mind is that you can use pfSense with Unifi switches and access points if you’d like. I previously had a 100% Ubiquiti set up for my home network using the USG as my router. To go higher you need to turn off SQM QoS. Missing most new security, routing, and VPN features USG, 2x AP LITEs, UniFi Controller Obviously because of fiber and the USG power I have had to turn off IPS/IDS- while I know this is a more advanced feature and not really necessary for a residential home it is a nice security feature to have. I currently have a USG but I'm thinking of switching to pfsense. I'm looking into upgrading my home WiFi with Ubiquiti gear but I want to have the features of pfSense but View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. That way you do all the routing in pfSense and can then just break out as needed in Unifi. pFsense is fine but the learning curve is steeper and doesn't provide central management of wi-fi and switching like Unifi does. In this article, we delve into these solutions, conduct a comprehensive feature and I have a production pfsense firewall deployed for almost 4 years now on a dedicated Supermicro server running with an 8-core Intel Atom Rangley. 5Gbps with smart queue, DPI and IDS/IPS enabled, all while drawing a maximum of 18W. I thought about a pfSense, IPFire, or or router solution, but the thought of being out of the country without also carrying a personal laptop to support was a situation that I didn’t want to put my family in (some countries don’t allow a 2nd laptop unless it is touchscreen so that we pfSense vs Untangle vs Ubiquiti. This can give you the “best of both worlds” and will allow you to use pfSense as your firewall/router, with Unifi switches/access points behind it. Im debating on going Protectli w/ pfsense vs UDM-SE. Throughput The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips, TechQuickie and other LinusMediaGroup content. There was one thing Pihole did very easily that I miss though, and that was the ability to see the query log of addresses/domains accessed. I have a UCK Gen2 Unifi for wifi (maybe) switching, pfSense for firewall and routing. It's way better than a udm pro in configurability. The USG-Pro is much more reliable than the UDM so don't base your Unifi experience on the UDM. Depends what you want. UniFi Gateway Comparison: USG vs UDM vs UXG. PFsense or untangle are much more versatile products as routers and firewalls. Since it’s all standards based interop is fine. Does the USG do what you need? pfSense is great at what it does, but from what I've read (no personal experience) the USG is a good router. 100/10 connection now ( Planning to upgrade to 250/10 in the near future ). Feel free to talk shop, share I have been a ui user for a few years but only for switches and aps. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. The PSU light was 'strobing' under load and with each bright 'strobe' the USG would chirp. I have used Mikrotik routers a lot before and like the features you get, and don't particularly mind the interface, but the RB4011 is a little pricy when you compare it to what the 2011 and 3011 sold for We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Advice on network upgrade (USG vs PfSense) Hi y'all! I have a 100Mbps network connection but I have an Airport Extreme, so I'm not taking advantage of my full bandwidth. Keys for me are ease of use with deep extensibility where I need it. There are two categories and a few models in each. I also want to mention that I installed PIA vpn on pfsense and it gave me full up/down on my 300/300 connection. Ubiquity have different product lines. I found that the initial questions I had about pfSense had already been answered by the community. Any of the three devices (UXG-Lite, UXG-Pro, or USG) can do these and your bandwidth and intrusion detection requirements will dictate which one will suit your purposes. I am loving the GUI maybe too much, and now eyeing the USG to have the entire package. The ultra is perfect for you business requirements. But he also did a video recently of setting a lake house with a dual WAN UDM-Pro, UniFi switches & WAPs plus a AirMax PtMP setup. Ubiquiti USG vs OPNSense vs RB4011 for 1Gb FTTH On the other hand it would be good experience to learn as an alternative to pfsense. This will probably keep me in the UniFi ecosystem for another cycle, but I’ve long since stopped recommending it to people because the routing options are pretty bad. Planning on connecting it via SFP to an Ubiquiti US-48-750W switch to 40 or so connections (rooms, APs, Sonos, IP cameras and the rest). and then I decided almost right away that I won't be using the Ubiquity router for anything else than cosmetic reasons by keeping the Cloud Key happy that it's got a full-blown UniFi-setup. the CPU in the 2 isn't strong enough to run firewall without performance dropping Not at all. Current network has 4 APs, and 4 switches. Hi all, Bit of a random question, but I have a Ubiquiti USG firewall and Im wondering which will give me the best performance, this or a custom PfSense router with intel GB cards, I sold my USG Pro for a pfSense box. Locked post. SPOILER. If you want to stick with Unifi I'd probably wait until the UXG-Pro comes out which will be the proper replacement for the USG/USG-Pro line. After pfSense - Clunky setup and config, great if you want a million options to play with or have patience. I recently went down the pfSense rabbit hole, and I love the flexibility and ease of use coupled with power People thought the UDM-Pro would be the upgrade to the USG-Pro. The USG Pro would be great but it's rackmount only. udm . UDM vs PfSense(T620 Plus) Hello, I am currently using USG and new two Ubiquiti APS. My currently network has between 15-20 devices on it and could go to 30 if I moved. I have the whitebox machine minus the second NIC. That may or may not be a concern. I have one main network running on pFsense for servers, phones, and a small guest network, and behind that is the USG pro running it’s own network for employee devices and such. I’ve found that I only rarely miss the DPI insights from a USG, however. Before Omada, I used pfSense. UniFi USG vs Edgerouter Lite/POE . We just replaced the USG Pro4 with the pfSense box, and I was up and running withing minutes and over 1 weekend I had all my old UniFi gateway rules and more up running on pfSense. Pfsense has more packages available that businesses can take advantage of. Between VLANs, the traffic first has to go to the USG, which is routing, be subjected to whatever rules and other configuration you have on both it and pfsense, and then be forwarded to the next vlan. USG vs PFSense . You can also roll your own (eg pfsense) but then you’ll need to manage them outside the Unifi ecosystem. My only complaint with the USG is the lack of blocking and DNS features. On our network we have only 6 computers running Linux Mint 18, 6 iPhones, 6 iPads, 6 new iMac Minis, 2 x NAS with total of 65TB Raid 10, 28 cameras, 127 IoT Devices, 8 defined networks & The USG is fine, as long if you just want a basic firewall with basic stats. VLANs are trunked up to the Edgerouter, which then routes to the “lan” between the Edgerouter and PfSense. PfSense is WAY more powerful as far as configuration possibilities. The only thing better for me about using pfBlockerNG (probably more pfSense related) vs pi-hole has been using DoT vs DoH on the pi-hole. My USG 3P power supply died last night just suddenly. Hi all, I'm a home user with a USG, several switches and APs and the controller running on my QNAP NAS. Ubiquiti USG vs PfSense . I've had to replace 3-4 over the years, but they work nicely. I would do L3 routing on the ag switch, but i don't get the control i want vs using pfsense. Build Suggestions vs Unifi USG . If it's just as a downstream router between pfSense and the access point(s) then there should not be any config required as long as pfSense is the default route for the USG. Join and Discuss evolving technology, new entrants, charging infrastructure, government policy, The USG is a far inferior product to pfSense, Opnsense, or Untangle. I like Unifi and want to use there ecosystem. A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. I switch from a 7 year old UniFi USG to Firewalla Gold Plus. I just bought a USG and a nanoHD to upgrade from an existing consumer router. 5 GHz with a used server grade Intel NIC (Total cost was $250 used Dell, used NIC and new SATA SSD. Edgerouter series is more command line admin oriented, but more capable/flexible that way. SonicWALLs are 3x more expensive and the yearly maintenance is 2x more than a new Unifi. I don't have any specific reasons but would like to explore adding a hardware firewall as I hear the Ubiquiti is not as robust and would really cripple my USG if I turned it on. I’d either wait for the new USG possibly sometime this year, or make another pfsense box. " Enabling IPS will affect the USG maximum throughput on inter-VLAN and egress traffic. This video was about why they don’t use the UniFi gateway products like USG or UDM and use pfSense instead for their business customers. And it does 800Mbps VPN. Also, the big reason for using a USG is that I recently picked up a USG Pro 4 as a sort of impulse buy with the idea replacing my pfSense box. Downside is, USG will fail about once every 4-5 years in my experience. the UDM-SE as a rack mount size) I've found that pfSense and pfBlockerNG is a pretty nice combination and have opted to just use pfSense full time now, thereby decommissioning the need for the USG as well as Pihole. Considering moving from netgear r7000 dd wrt to Unifi network. The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips, TechQuickie and other LinusMediaGroup content. There are some other pretty substantial differences as well that are well documented elsewhere. I still think pfSense is superior, but its hard to beat the simplicity of Omada (which is basically a copy of Unifi's UI, go figure). Or check it out in the app stores But my UDMP has been a pain in the ass-- I had to upgrade to it from a USG-4-PRO because I upgraded to 2. I'd like to have site-to-site setup between my pfsense box at home and a Unifi USG at my folk's house. Not as many people use OPNSense. I want the USG to handle everything else, DHCP, routing, Vlans, everything. I was able to segregate my main home network from my security camera network with relative ease. I have seen many people mentioning firewalls such as pfsense. It is fine for a very simple network, but has no where near the functionality of the "big three" homelab router OSs. This thing handles web server traffic, email traffic, 4 vlans, couple VPN tunnels, several static WAN View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. UniFi gateway routers, like the Dream Machine or next-gen Gateway Lite, appear simple until you dig below the surface. On pfSense DoT just works, been solid, never stops working. So I'm starting to get tired of my old router (Asus RT-AC3200), I'm having issues with stability and missing some advanced features (I know, I know, you can connect trough telnet to get some advanced features, but it's not something i want I have a PFsense box infront of my USG Pro and it works just fine, with the PFsense box ahead of my USG it does defeat some of the USG "protections" but I get more control for the IDS/IPS pieces of Pfsense than I do my USG and I still get all the Unifi OS features since I have a USG connected to the rest of my Ubiquiti network. I had to set up Piehole on a spare Raspberry Pie and run DNS off my Synology 918. I like the idea of having wireless duties separate from routing tasks. I think I am going to go with a Protectli after all the recommendations on here. I've ran pfsense as my firewall and Unifi Switches/AP's For years now. So, I'm in the early stages of exploring PFSense, Pi-Hole, and Synology's Router and had a few questions I was hoping this group could help with? Yeah, for clients that size and budget, I'd consider Unifi over pFsense. The only advantage is that you can use the unified Unifi management gui, but given how little you really interact with your router once it is set up, that is a not a big selling point. But also seeking success (or failure) stories of people who've moved off of Unifi Gateway to pfSense (or any other) while keeping the rest of their Unifi setup (the APs are great, and the switches are fine). The table below should help understand the technical and commercial reasons why one I currently have a Unifi system that I am looking to replace the USG with a PFSense box. PfSense firewall or Unifi Security Gateway Only reason to have a USG is for the pretty graphs. pfSense is more robust and feature-rich, and yet I find the user interface much more intuitive than the Unifi controller. Or check it out in the app stores The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. The USG-4 is really outdated, even for a home connection. See a previous post of mine where I have a homelab and a remote 'homelab' and currently they are connected via a pfsense-dd-wrt connection. The ER seems to have better performance than the USG/USG Pro, but the controller integration with the AP is great with the USG. Pfsense could in theory be used in an enterprise environment, it lacks the config/management interfaces you expect from pro gear. So instead of easily making changes via the CLI like with the edge line you have to write json files to make the features work and stick. After lots of reading on reddit and ubiquiti forums I have concluded that ER-4 is a better investment that USG-PRO-4 because its packs more horsepower and costs about $150 less where I live. The mini-pc is going to be more expensive but it is a general purpose machine that I can reuse elsewhere if needed. There are things like failover that pfSense does better, but how many homes realistically have multiple WAN connections ? View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit.